DEPTH / FEES / EXECUTION
A better route starts with the whole cost.
A swap-route comparison workspace. Compare direct and two-hop paths, including pool fees, depth and a user-set execution cost.
Explore a market scenario.
Illustrative inputs · not live pool data| Pair category | Lens | Worksheet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equity / stableMarket-session scenario | Two paths | Scenario 01 | |
| Major / stableDepth comparison | Two paths | Scenario 02 | |
| Stable / stableCost-sensitive pair | Two paths | Scenario 03 |
Lorevex / MARKET DESIGN LAB
Read both paths.
A MARKET WITH ITS WORKING SHOWN
Read the route before the trade.
The calculation.
The bridge route pays two pool fees and two execution costs. Deeper pools can nevertheless improve the final output. All assets begin at an illustrative 1:1 price so the comparison is explicit.
direct = CP(amount, direct depth, 0.30%) − execution cost two hops = CP(CP(amount, bridge depth, 0.20%), bridge depth, 0.20%) − 2 × cost
The next chapter.
Read verified pool reserves and route-specific gas estimates, define quote expiry and slippage bounds, then test routing contracts.
Development context.
Building on Robinhood Chain. This release implements a local market-design worksheet. It has no deployed swap, staking, governance or incentive contract. Wallet connection displays an approved address and network only.
Proposed project symbol: $LORE. Contract and trading links will be added after a verified launch.
Uniswap v4 hooks are a design reference for extensible pool logic, not a claim that this worksheet deploys or audits those contracts. Read Uniswap's hook documentation ↗
CAPTURE THE ASSUMPTIONS
Your market notes.
Saved in this tab only. Download the JSON to retain it after closing or refreshing.
No scenarios saved yet. Open the workspace, adjust inputs and save a scenario.